Qualtrics Survey | Qualtrics Experience Management

Call for unpublished data for a meta-analysis on the role of emotions in collective action

We are currently conducting a meta-analysis on the role of emotions in collective action participation in democratic vs. authoritarian political regimes. We have already identified a number of published studies on this topic and we are now looking for unpublished quantitative data.

If your study used a measure that pertained to any type of emotions (exemplary items: anger, fear, disgust, sadness, hope, happy, contempt, admiration), and collective action (exemplary items: I would be willing to participate/participated in protests on social media, protests on the streets), we would be very grateful if you could share some information about your unpublished or soon to be published data (including manuscripts and theses/dissertations) with us.

If you have more than one emotion (e.g., anger and hope) OR one type of collective action (e.g., violent and non-violent collective action) in your study(ies), please mention each separate emotion OR separate collective action in the survey (and their relationships). The deadline to submit information about your study is August 1, 2022.

Thank you for your time and for considering our request. Please get in touch with us if you have any questions (omu20@sussex.ac.uk).

Kind regards,
Özden Melis Uluğ, University of Sussex
Nevin Solak
Yasemin Gülsüm Acar, University of Dundee
Maria Chayinska, University of Studies of Messina
Nicole Tausch, St. Andrews University

1) What is the type of study (e.g., experimental, correlational, longitudinal)?

If you report more than one study, please report the type of each study (e.g., Study 1-correlational; Study 2-experimental, etc.):

2) Emotion items (together with the instructions given to participants; e.g., participants were asked about how much they would feel each emotion in response to their government)

Please provide all the items you used to measure an emotion construct:

3) Collective action items (together with the instructions given to participants; e.g., participants were asked they are to engage in five different collective action behaviors against racial injustice)

Please provide all the items you used to measure a collective action construct:

4) Context where the study was conducted (e.g., Turkey, South Africa).

If you report more than one study, please report the context of each study (e.g., Study 1-Turkey; Study 2-South Africa, etc.):

5) When was the study conducted (e.g., 2017)?

If you report more than one study, please report the time for each study (e.g., Study 1 in 2017; Study 2 in 2018, etc.):

6) Sample characteristics (type of sample such as students, activists, Germans, women, etc.)

If you report more than one study, please report the sample characteristics of each study (e.g., Study 1-activists; Study 2-university students, etc.):

7) What is the sample size?

If you report more than one study, please report the sample size of each study (e.g., Study 1-129; Study 2-2037, etc.):

8) Pearson coefficient (r) and its statistical significance for the relationship between emotion & collective action participation (e.g., r = .12, p = .002)

If you report more than one study (or even more than one emotion/CA in a study), please report the numbers separately (e.g., Study 1-anger & non-violent CA: r = 13, p = .009; hope & non-violent CA: r = .27, p = .067; hope & violent CA: r = -.25, p = .019; Study 2-anger & violent CA: r = .33, p = .001, etc.):

9) Citation of your work (APA format):

One example: Uluğ, Ö. M., Solak, N., Acar, Y. G., Chayinska, M., & Tausch, N. (2022). The role of emotions in collective action in democratic vs. authoritarian political regimes. Unpublished data.

10) Contact information for further correspondence (optional):

Is there anything else you would like to add before you submit your responses?